8–10 min
Click any dashed highlight for context. Use arrow keys to move through the tour; Esc closes notes.
No login required · Sample data only
See how Clearline moves lab work from sample receipt to final report.
Clearline LIMS gives environmental and materials labs a cleaner way to track samples, custody, prep work, review, reports, and exports without forcing the team into a generic business app. This short tour uses sample data so you can see the workflow at your own pace.
What this tour shows
- Work queues for intake, prep, review, and reporting
- COCs, labels, worksheets, and reports tied to sample records
- Review gates before results leave the lab
- A managed path from evaluation to hosted production support
Clients
| Name | Client ID | Contacts | Default turn-around | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acme Environmental Services | AES | 4 | 5 business days | Active | |
| Municipal Water Authority | MWA | 7 | 24 hour rush available | Active | |
| Industrial Remediation Group | IRG | 3 | Project-specific | Active |
Client defaults
- Report recipients
- Primary PM + alternate QA contact
- Project templates
- Groundwater, soil, industrial hygiene
- Deliverable format
- Standard PDF + CSV export
Why this screen matters
Start here when the conversation is about multi-site clients, project-specific requirements, or reducing administrative cleanup after samples arrive.
Samples
| Sample ID | Client | Matrix | Analyses | Received | Due | State |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GW-0010 | Acme Environmental | Groundwater | Metals + VOC | 08:42 | Friday 17:00 | Received |
| SO-0042 | Industrial Remediation | Soil | RCRA 8 | 09:15 | Monday 12:00 | In prep |
| DW-0712 | Municipal Water | Drinking Water | Coliform | 10:02 | Today 16:00 | Rush |
GW-0010 · Receipt fields
Chain of Custody
Print labelsContainer labels with sample, preservative, due date, and barcode.
COC packageCustody form attached to the sample record and report package.
Transfer logReceipt, relinquish, hold, and disposal events stay auditable.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY · COC-2026-1442
| Sample | Matrix | Containers | Preservation | Requested |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GW-0010 | Groundwater | 2 x 250ml HDPE | HNO3, 4°C | Metals, VOC |
Relinquished by: Field TechReceived by: Lab IntakeTime: 08:42
Digestion Worksheet
Metals Prep Batch · MB-2026-0617-AIn prep
| Position | Sample | Aliquot | Acid | Digest temp | Tech | QC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MBLK-01 | 50.0 mL | 5 mL HNO3 | 95°C | J. Reeves | Method Blank |
| 2 | GW-0010 | 50.0 mL | 5 mL HNO3 | 95°C | J. Reeves | Sample |
| 3 | LCS-01 | 50.0 mL | 5 mL HNO3 | 95°C | J. Reeves | LCS |
Worksheet — Data Review
To be verifiedICP-MS Metals · Run ICP-2026-0617-02
| Analyte | Result | Units | MDL | Limit | Flags | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 0.004 | mg/L | 0.001 | 0.010 | Pass | |
| Zinc | 7.42 | mg/L | 0.005 | 5.00 | E over range | Retest |
| Lead | 0.002 | mg/L | 0.001 | 0.015 | Pass |
Reviewer note: Zinc result marked for dilution and retest. Original result preserved. Retest result must pass before technical approval.
Technical Review
Review gates
- Analyst reviewRun checked, QC linked, retest completed.
- Technical reviewResults verified and exceptions resolved.
- Final approvalReport rendered and locked for issue.
Audit trail
| 10:14 | Zinc flagged over range |
| 10:39 | Dilution run imported |
| 10:47 | Technical review approved |
| 10:49 | Sample locked for reporting |
Rendered Reports
Certificate of AnalysisGW-0010 · Acme Environmental
Analytical Results
| Analyte | Result | Units | Limit | Qualifier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic | 0.004 | mg/L | 0.010 | |
| Zinc | 4.88 | mg/L | 5.00 | Dilution verified |
| Lead | 0.002 | mg/L | 0.015 |
COA PDFClient-ready report
COC attachmentCustody included
CSV / EDDStructured export
Package archiveAuditable snapshot
At-your-leisure follow-up
Want the tour link and a short fit-check worksheet?
Answer a short fit-check form and we’ll route your request with the right context: workflow goals, reporting needs, timeline, and who should follow up.
Good-fit signals
- Lab runs on spreadsheets, legacy software, or paper-heavy review
- Reports, COCs, labels, or exports are recurring friction points
- Workflow needs configuration rather than a blank-slate rebuild
- Team wants managed hosting and support with clear accountability